Where most people live in crowded homes

The share of inhabitants living in overcrowded homes.

Oslo has the highest share living in overcrowded homes of Norway's municipalities at 20.4% (2025). The lowest is Kvitsøy at 1.6%. Source: SSB, table 14902, processed by Morning Analytics 3 November 2026.

Download the table (CSV) Sharing image (PNG)

20.4%Highest: Oslo
6.9%Median of the municipalities
1.6%Lowest: Kvitsøy

The picture in figures

The bars show the ten highest and the ten lowest of 357 municipalities. The dashed line is the median of all municipalities.

Highest 10
OsloOslo20.4%LørenskogLørenskog16.0%ÅsÅs15.5%KautokeinoKautokeino14.9%FjalerFjaler14.4%UllensakerUllensaker13.3%BergenBergen13.1%RøyrvikRøyrvik12.8%TrondheimTrondheim12.7%LekaLeka12.6%
Lowest 10
KvitsøyKvitsøy1.6%BoknBokn1.8%ÅseralÅseral2.8%LesjaLesja3.6%BjerkreimBjerkreim3.6%FarsundFarsund3.8%SiljanSiljan3.8%HvalerHvaler3.9%AverøyAverøy3.9%MoskenesMoskenes4.0%
How 357 municipalities spread
1.6% – 3.2%: 33.2% – 4.7%: 284.7% – 6.3%: 946.3% – 7.9%: 1197.9% – 9.4%: 609.4% – 11.0%: 2611.0% – 12.6%: 1712.6% – 14.1%: 514.1% – 15.7%: 315.7% – 17.3%: 117.3% – 18.8%: 018.8% – 20.4%: 11.6%20.4%share living in overcrowded homes →

Each bar is the number of municipalities in a range of values. The dashed line is the median. Hover over a bar to see the range.

Analysis: why are some at the top and others at the bottom?

We compared share living in overcrowded homes with every other municipal figure we have, from Statistics Norway, NIPH and the Brønnøysund Register Centre. Below are the figures that go most closely together with share living in overcrowded homes across the country, and what marks the municipalities at the top and bottom on those figures.

The pattern across the country

The highest and the lowest

  • No. 1 Oslo (20.4%) Fits the pattern: «Share with upper secondary as highest education (16 and over)» 22.7% (no. 357 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 09429); «Detached houses, share of all dwellings» 7.9% (no. 357 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 06265); «Share in households with persistent low income (EU60)» 14.4% (no. 1 of 357 from the top; NIPH indicator 403). Most distinctive industry: tjenester tilknyttet informasjonsteknologi, 6% of the jobs, 2.6 times the national share (Statistics Norway table 13470, 2025).
  • No. 2 Lørenskog (16.0%) Fits the pattern: «Detached houses, share of all dwellings» 23.8% (no. 355 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 06265); «Share with upper secondary as highest education (16 and over)» 32.8% (no. 343 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 09429); «Share in households with persistent low income (EU60)» 10.5% (no. 29 of 357 from the top; NIPH indicator 403). Most distinctive industry: post og distribusjonsvirksomhet, 6% of the jobs, 10.4 times the national share (Statistics Norway table 13470, 2025).
  • No. 3 Ås (15.5%) Fits the pattern: «Share with upper secondary as highest education (16 and over)» 30.0% (no. 350 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 09429); «Detached houses, share of all dwellings» 41.1% (no. 341 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 06265); «Share in households with persistent low income (EU60)» 9.8% (no. 47 of 357 from the top; NIPH indicator 403). Most distinctive industry: forskning og utviklingsarbeid, 8% of the jobs, 12.3 times the national share (Statistics Norway table 13470, 2025).
  • No. 357 Kvitsøy (1.6%, among the lowest) Fits the pattern: «Detached houses, share of all dwellings» 84.9% (no. 55 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 06265); «Share with upper secondary as highest education (16 and over)» 44.9% (no. 74 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 09429). Goes against the pattern: «Share in households with persistent low income (EU60)» 10.4% (no. 30 of 357 from the top; NIPH indicator 403). Most distinctive industry: spesialisert bygge- og anleggsvirksomhet, 40% of the jobs, 8.5 times the national share (Statistics Norway table 13470, 2025).
  • No. 356 Bokn (1.8%, among the lowest) Fits the pattern: «Share with upper secondary as highest education (16 and over)» 49.0% (no. 10 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 09429); «Job coverage (jobs per employed resident)» 63.5% (no. 319 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 11618). Most distinctive industry: fiske, fangst og akvakultur, 18% of the jobs, 22.6 times the national share (Statistics Norway table 13470, 2025).
  • No. 355 Åseral (2.8%, among the lowest) Fits the pattern: «Share with upper secondary as highest education (16 and over)» 51.8% (no. 1 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 09429); «Detached houses, share of all dwellings» 90.2% (no. 5 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 06265). Goes against the pattern: «Share in households with persistent low income (EU60)» 11.9% (no. 7 of 357 from the top; NIPH indicator 403). Most distinctive industry: jordbruk og tjenester tilknyttet jordbruk, jakt og viltstell, 33% of the jobs, 25.6 times the national share (Statistics Norway table 13470, 2025).

The analysis describes what goes together, not what causes what. Two figures can follow each other because both depend on something else, such as size, location or industry. The figures are from the latest year available for each source, so the years can differ. Rank correlation runs from −1 to 1; values near 1 mean the municipalities lie in roughly the same order on both measures.

What explains the placing?

  • 1. Oslo 20.4% 196% above the median of the municipalities.
  • 2. Lørenskog 16.0% 132% above the median of the municipalities.
  • 3. Ås 15.5% 125% above the median of the municipalities.
  • 355. Åseral 2.8% Small municipality (904 inhabitants): one company or a few people can move the figure a lot. 59% below the median of the municipalities.
  • 356. Bokn 1.8% Small municipality (907 inhabitants): one company or a few people can move the figure a lot. 74% below the median of the municipalities.
  • 357. Kvitsøy 1.6% Small municipality (579 inhabitants): one company or a few people can move the figure a lot. 77% below the median of the municipalities.
#Municipality County Inhabitants share living in overcrowded homes
151 Ørsta Møre og Romsdal 11,068 7.2%
152 Dønnasmall municipality Nordland 1,445 7.2%
153 Nes Akershus 24,948 7.2%
154 Øvre Eiker Buskerud 20,965 7.2%
155 Tynset Innlandet 5,762 7.2%
156 Sel Innlandet 5,469 7.2%
157 Målselv Troms 6,819 7.2%
158 Senja Troms 14,946 7.2%
159 Randaberg Rogaland 11,841 7.1%
160 Strand Rogaland 13,959 7.1%
161 Vefsn Nordland 13,481 7.1%
162 Andøysmall municipality Nordland 4,525 7.1%
163 Tønsberg Vestfold 60,246 7.1%
164 Gjerstadsmall municipality Agder 2,502 7.1%
165 Stad Vestland 9,616 7.1%
166 Oppdal Trøndelag 7,421 7.1%
167 Sørfoldsmall municipality Nordland 1,819 7.0%
168 Flakstadsmall municipality Nordland 1,235 7.0%
169 Engerdalsmall municipality Innlandet 1,287 7.0%
170 Larvik Vestfold 49,022 7.0%
171 Vegårsheismall municipality Agder 2,253 7.0%
172 Lyngdal Agder 10,922 7.0%
173 Haugesund Rogaland 38,663 6.9%
174 Klepp Rogaland 21,444 6.9%
175 Stange Innlandet 21,839 6.9%
176 Vågåsmall municipality Innlandet 3,553 6.9%
177 Skaun Trøndelag 8,574 6.9%
178 Tydalsmall municipality Trøndelag 773 6.9%
179 Vadsø Finnmark 5,808 6.9%
180 Vardøsmall municipality Finnmark 1,969 6.9%
181 Aukrasmall municipality Møre og Romsdal 3,780 6.8%
182 Lunner Akershus 9,463 6.8%
183 Birkenes Agder 5,447 6.8%
184 Melhus Trøndelag 17,828 6.8%
185 Vestnes Møre og Romsdal 7,315 6.7%
186 Sunndal Møre og Romsdal 7,094 6.7%
187 Frogn Akershus 16,429 6.7%
188 Porsgrunn Telemark 37,435 6.7%
189 Tokkesmall municipality Telemark 2,242 6.7%
190 Voss Vestland 16,438 6.7%
191 Holtålensmall municipality Trøndelag 2,037 6.7%
192 Time Rogaland 20,461 6.6%
193 Trænasmall municipality Nordland 443 6.6%
194 Enebakk Akershus 11,697 6.6%
195 Modum Buskerud 14,776 6.6%
196 Våler (Innlandet)small municipality Innlandet 3,614 6.6%
197 Nord-Fron Innlandet 5,493 6.6%
198 Øyer Innlandet 5,130 6.6%
199 Arendal Agder 46,603 6.6%
200 Byglandsmall municipality Agder 1,167 6.6%