Language:NO / EN

Jordbruk og skogbruk ranking 2024

Press mode: top and bottom with source credit

Benchmarks · fiscal year 2024

Quartiles among the 392 ranked companies, all sizes. Half of them lie between the lower and upper quartile.

Key figureLower quartileMedianUpper quartile
Operating margin0.3%6.9%15.4%
Profit margin−0.5%5.8%14.8%
Return on assets1.5%10.2%22.7%
Equity ratio20.8%46.4%64.5%
Debt-to-equity0.491.012.70
Current ratio1.011.572.57
Revenue growth−2.0%8.6%24.5%

Ranked per Morning company class: Micro: 224 · Small: 119 · Medium: 48 · Large: 1. Morning company classes by revenue: Micro 1–10 MNOK, Small 10 MNOK–50 MNOK, Medium 50 MNOK–500 MNOK, Large from 500 MNOK. Methodology

Distribution of the overall index · 2024

03875Index 0–10: 8 companies80Index 10–20: 26 companies2610Index 20–30: 41 companies4120Index 30–40: 49 companies4930Index 40–50: 69 companies6940Index 50–60: 75 companies7550Index 60–70: 61 companies6160Index 70–80: 43 companies4370Index 80–90: 19 companies1980Index 90–100: 1 companies190100Index →

Best in each category · 2024

Operating marginM A Eiendom AS68.2%
Return on assetsVestfold Bær Produksjon AS76.5%
Equity ratioOnna Greens AS92.9%
Current ratioEgge Gård AS9.17
Revenue growthFramtre Entreprenør AS100.2%

Among ranked companies with at least NOK 10m in revenue. Margins and equity ratios above 100 %, a current ratio above 20 and growth from a base below NOK 10m count as one-off effects and are left out.

Ranking · 2024

Morning Enterprise Index 0–100, version 2: every key figure is compared with companies in the same sector and size tier. Click a column heading to sort.

Rank Company Class Index Operating margin Equity ratio Current ratio Revenue growth Revenue
1 Berlimo Pels AS Microno. 1 in the class 98 557.2% 98.5% 18.03 3,595.5% 2 MNOK
2 Tveråen Skogsdrift AS Microno. 2 in the class 87 44.8% 81.2% 5.17 72.6% 5 MNOK
3 Kringsjå Samdrift AS Microno. 3 in the class 87 69.3% 90.1% 10.99 6.3% 1 MNOK
4 Altiskog AS Mediumno. 1 in the class 86 13.6% 63.6% 2.73 35.1% 159 MNOK
5 Malmerengen Skog AS Smallno. 1 in the class 85 19.3% 80.3% 4.01 47.8% 11 MNOK
6 Rias-Produkter AS Microno. 4 in the class 85 15.4% 78.2% 4.59 63.8% 4 MNOK
7 Fredrik Nannestad Jr AS Mediumno. 2 in the class 84 22.5% 71.0% 3.80 18.1% 54 MNOK
8 Jørgensen Skog AS Mediumno. 3 in the class 84 14.4% 55.8% 2.36 33.0% 61 MNOK
9 Riis Gartneri AS Smallno. 2 in the class 84 34.5% 88.4% 3.36 11.7% 25 MNOK
10 Romnes Moreller AS Microno. 5 in the class 83 18.5% 92.4% 10.08 2.2% 3 MNOK
11 Bakke Gård AS Smallno. 3 in the class 83 31.5% 83.4% 4.62 21.4% 18 MNOK
12 Dahl Maskinentreprenør AS Smallno. 4 in the class 83 31.5% 77.5% 3.96 22.0% 16 MNOK
13 Tysseland Skog og Vedlikehold AS Microno. 6 in the class 82 52.4% 92.0% 12.92 6.2% 2 MNOK
14 M A Eiendom AS Smallno. 5 in the class 82 68.2% 84.1% – 1.1% 33 MNOK
15 JT Skog AS Smallno. 6 in the class 82 25.3% 78.1% 1.83 142.5% 14 MNOK
16 Sollid Skog AS Smallno. 7 in the class 81 26.9% 64.5% 2.97 33.9% 18 MNOK
17 Hurum Hogst og Graving AS Microno. 7 in the class 80 22.6% 89.8% 8.39 16.8% 7 MNOK
18 Tin Milovanovic Skogservice AS Mediumno. 4 in the class 80 18.4% 84.7% 4.28 9.2% 52 MNOK
19 Øvre Holt Gård AS Microno. 8 in the class 80 11.8% 86.8% 4.36 10.9% 4 MNOK
20 Seim Trær og Planter AS Smallno. 8 in the class 80 15.8% 73.5% 4.34 70.5% 21 MNOK
21 HOVE & Slettebø AS Smallno. 9 in the class 80 32.8% 69.6% 3.57 141.9% 10 MNOK
22 H A Skajems Planteskole AS Mediumno. 5 in the class 80 25.9% 80.0% 3.18 5.3% 55 MNOK
23 Furuli Skogsdrift AS Microno. 9 in the class 80 28.3% 80.1% 7.85 18.7% 4 MNOK
24 M. Ellingsen Skogsdrift AS Microno. 10 in the class 79 31.5% 78.3% 3.99 4.0% 1 MNOK
25 Haukali Gard AS Smallno. 10 in the class 79 20.2% 79.4% 3.02 33.1% 19 MNOK
26 Næsbø Skog AS Mediumno. 6 in the class 79 18.7% 73.8% 1.87 11.9% 122 MNOK
27 Lier Grønt AS Smallno. 11 in the class 78 10.9% 85.6% 6.16 23.4% 22 MNOK
28 Vestfold Bær Produksjon AS Smallno. 12 in the class 77 22.8% 64.3% 2.23 30.2% 11 MNOK
29 Trefellingsspesialisten AS Smallno. 13 in the class 77 39.8% 89.7% 1.02 9.8% 11 MNOK
30 AKTIESELSKAPET ODALS VÆRK Microno. 11 in the class 77 24.3% 82.6% 4.84 20.4% 10 MNOK
31 Mona Drift AS Microno. 12 in the class 76 33.4% 62.9% 1.53 43.1% 3 MNOK
32 Hundeskolen Veiviseren AS Smallno. 14 in the class 76 13.5% 82.3% 5.36 18.5% 18 MNOK
33 O. Espedal Handelsgartneri AS Mediumno. 7 in the class 76 23.5% 64.1% 1.82 9.9% 93 MNOK
34 Runar Lien AS Microno. 13 in the class 76 30.3% 57.1% 2.03 49.3% 7 MNOK
35 Mats Erik Storstad AS Microno. 14 in the class 75 12.9% 60.9% 3.12 36.2% 4 MNOK
36 Stangeskovene AS Mediumno. 8 in the class 75 14.8% 87.1% 1.88 25.0% 97 MNOK
37 Mellbyes Planteskole AS Mediumno. 9 in the class 75 18.9% 65.9% 2.36 8.4% 61 MNOK
38 Vesterålen Skogsdrift AS Microno. 15 in the class 75 15.4% 74.5% 2.30 14.4% 10 MNOK
39 Jæren Maskinservice AS Microno. 16 in the class 74 18.0% 71.8% 2.01 23.1% 4 MNOK
40 Skjerpet AS Microno. 17 in the class 74 18.1% 66.8% 1.99 50.3% 3 MNOK
41 Vammenbær AS Microno. 18 in the class 74 7.1% 73.9% 1.58 47.5% 4 MNOK
42 Lunde Skog AS Smallno. 15 in the class 74 26.4% 57.0% 2.48 27.0% 26 MNOK
43 Bonden Bær AS Smallno. 16 in the class 74 23.7% 41.8% 3.90 61.1% 15 MNOK
44 Tmh Landbruk AS Microno. 19 in the class 73 32.6% 65.7% 2.64 −0.2% 6 MNOK
45 EK Gårdspakkeri AS Smallno. 17 in the class 73 8.6% 89.8% 8.03 8.3% 27 MNOK
46 Inderøy Hønseri AS Smallno. 18 in the class 73 46.3% 79.5% 3.21 −50.6% 21 MNOK
47 Numedal Skogsdrift AS Microno. 20 in the class 73 12.4% 63.0% 2.61 18.6% 7 MNOK
48 Nor-Skog AS Microno. 21 in the class 73 8.9% 83.5% 4.49 18.9% 10 MNOK
49 Nes Maskin AS Microno. 22 in the class 72 10.7% 73.3% 2.92 32.8% 5 MNOK
50 Garden Oppheim AS Microno. 23 in the class 72 29.8% 59.9% 2.12 – 3 MNOK

Bankrupt or being wound up

These companies are left out of the ranking.

Showing 50 of 82. See all bankruptcies and liquidations

About the figures

  • Only limited companies (AS and ASA) are included. Sole proprietorships are normally not required to file annual accounts and are therefore missing.
  • The Brønnøysund Register Centre only checks that accounts are filed, not their content. Suspicious figures are flagged on the company page, not hidden.
  • Figures are company accounts, not group accounts. Holding companies can be marked in admin and then do not count in sector averages.