Quick Style AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
18of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 8 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 489 of 531 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 726 of 782 · Undervisning
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 8 and solidity 23 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Quick Style AS is 31 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 49 among 531 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −10.4% (median 3.1%) and equity ratio 11.5% (median 31.9%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 8 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −10.4% | 3.1% |
| Profit margin | −15.7% | 2.8% |
| Return on assets | −44.4% | 8.5% |
| Equity ratio | 11.5% | 31.9% |
| Debt-to-equity | 7.67 | 1.42 |
| Current ratio | 0.46 | 1.43 |
| Revenue growth | −23.6% | 4.5% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 18, Quick Style AS does better than 8% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (531 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Quick Style AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Quick Style AS has a score of 18 for 2025, rank 726 of 782 in the sector.
Strongest: Consistency: percentile 50 against peers.
Weakest: Growth: percentile 8 against peers, revenue growth −23.6% against a median of 4.5%. Profitability: percentile 8 against peers, operating margin −10.4% against a median of 3.1%.
Worth a closer look
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.2 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.46 (median 1.43).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −15.7% (median 2.8%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −10.4% (median 3.1%).
- What lies behind weak growth, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
Quick Style AS had an operating margin of −10.4% and an equity ratio of 11.5% in 2025, and ranks 726 of 782 in Undervisning.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from 16.3% to −10.4% and went from a profit to a loss before tax.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 0 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 0 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.2 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.46 (median 1.43).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −15.7% (median 2.8%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −10.4% (median 3.1%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 26.4% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of −5.7%. Based on the 7 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 8 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 23 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 9 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 8 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 50 | weight 15% |
Durability: 52 (average over 2 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Quick Style AS?
The operating margin was −10.4% in 2025, against a median of 3.1% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −44.4%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Quick Style AS?
The equity ratio was 11.5% in 2025 (median 31.9%). Debt-to-equity was 7.67 (median 1.42).
What is the liquidity of Quick Style AS like?
The current ratio was 0.46 in 2025 (median 1.43). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Quick Style AS compare in Undervisning?
Quick Style AS ranks 726 of 782 in Undervisning for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 489 of 531. Revenue changed by −23.6% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 814098052
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Undervisning (85.529)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 20 August 2014 12 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Lindebergveien 51C, 1069 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
- Website
- www.thequickstyle.com
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Daniel Amir Mustafa
- Chair of the board
- Nasir Sirikhan
- Board member
- Belal Ali Malik
- Board member
- Suleman Malik
- Auditor
- Revisjon Sør AS
- Accountant
- GERHARD & Sønn AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 29 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | – | 86 | 18 | |
| Rank | – | 18 | 726 | |
| Operating margin | – | 16.3% | −10.4% | |
| Return on assets | 0.0% | 69.7% | −44.4% | |
| Equity ratio | −58.4% | 55.3% | 11.5% | |
| Current ratio | 0.63 | 2.03 | 0.46 | |
| Revenue growth | – | – | −23.6% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | – | 10.9 MNOK | 8.3 MNOK |
| Operating profit | – | 1.8 MNOK | −0.9 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.0 MNOK | 1.8 MNOK | −1.3 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | −1.3 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | – | 0.1 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.1 MNOK | 2.7 MNOK | 1.9 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.1 MNOK | 2.4 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.0 MNOK | 1.5 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −0.1 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.1 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.1 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK | 1.7 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 29 October 2026, accounts id 7194703.
Further
Similar companies
- Dyrkolbotn Fjellstove AS index 19, rank 722 · compare
- Cefalon AS index 19, rank 723 · compare
- Børge Fagerli AS index 18, rank 724 · compare
- De NI Musene AS index 18, rank 728 · compare
- Igm AS index 17, rank 729 · compare