UMAS 27 AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
53of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 57 % of small companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 865 of 2,035 · Sjøfart
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 79 and solidity 0 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
UMAS 27 AS is 3 points above the median for small companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 1,468 companies.
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | – | 8.4% |
| Profit margin | – | 9.2% |
| Return on assets | 16.8% | 3.4% |
| Equity ratio | −1.2% | 51.2% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 0.67 |
| Current ratio | 589,241.00 | 1.77 |
| Revenue growth | – | 1.2% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 53, UMAS 27 AS does better than 57% of small companies in the same sector (1,475 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- UMAS 27 AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
UMAS 27 AS has a score of 53 for 2025, rank 865 of 2,035 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 100 against peers, current ratio 589,241.00 against a median of 1.77. Profitability: percentile 79 against peers.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 0 against peers, equity ratio −1.2% against a median of 51.2%.
Worth a closer look
- Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern? Based on: equity ratio −1.2% (median 51.2%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
UMAS 27 AS had an operating margin of – and an equity ratio of −1.2% in 2025, and ranks 865 of 2,035 in Sjøfart.
From 2024 to 2025: went from a loss to a profit before tax and the equity ratio rose from −6.6% to −1.2%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 3 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | 3 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | not meaningful |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −1.2% (median 51.2%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 8.7% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
- watch Revenue not reported
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of 6.1%. Based on the 7 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 79 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 100 | weight 15% |
| Growth | – | no data, left out |
| Consistency | 41 | weight 15% |
Durability: 38 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 85%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is UMAS 27 AS?
The operating margin was – in 2025, against a median of 8.4% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 16.8%.
How solid is UMAS 27 AS?
The equity ratio was −1.2% in 2025 (median 51.2%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of UMAS 27 AS like?
The current ratio was 589,241.00 in 2025 (median 1.77).
How does UMAS 27 AS compare in Sjøfart?
UMAS 27 AS ranks 865 of 2,035 in Sjøfart for 2025. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 632 of 1,475.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 930679968
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Sjøfart (50.201)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 8 December 2022 3 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- c/o FLYT kontor, Dronning Eufemias gate 8, 0191 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 106–282 of 357 in Norway
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 19 January 2023
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chair of the board
- Janne Green Heglund
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 25 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 27 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 30 | 31 | 53 | |
| Rank | 1,430 | 1,564 | 865 | |
| Operating margin | – | – | – | |
| Return on assets | 1.1% | 6.1% | 16.8% | |
| Equity ratio | 1.6% | −6.6% | −1.2% | |
| Current ratio | – | – | 589,241.00 | |
| Revenue growth | – | – | – |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | – | – | – |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.0 MNOK | −0.5 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | −0.5 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
| Total assets | 4.1 MNOK | 6.1 MNOK | 4.4 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.0 MNOK | 2.0 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.1 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.0 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 4.1 MNOK | 6.5 MNOK | 4.4 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | – | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 27 October 2026, accounts id 6832826.
Further
Similar companies
- BIOSTAR AS index 53, rank 859 · compare
- KISTEFOS CORPORATE AS index 53, rank 860 · compare
- UNION BULK III HOLDING AS index 53, rank 861 · compare
- FARM AS index 53, rank 864 · compare
- ERLING BØEN & SØNNER AS index 53, rank 866 · compare