Royal House AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
32of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 21 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 10,109 of 12,867 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 16,283 of 20,337 · Bygg og anlegg
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 40 and solidity 0 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Royal House AS is 18 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 12,860 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 3.2% (median 3.5%) and equity ratio −13.4% (median 32.8%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 3.2% | 3.5% |
| Profit margin | −14.5% | 3.0% |
| Return on assets | 1.1% | 7.8% |
| Equity ratio | −13.4% | 32.8% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 1.43 |
| Current ratio | 2.44 | 1.41 |
| Revenue growth | −0.1% | 6.0% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 32, Royal House AS does better than 21% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (12,867 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Royal House AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Royal House AS has a score of 32 for 2025, rank 16,283 of 20,337 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 78 against peers, current ratio 2.44 against a median of 1.41.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 0 against peers, equity ratio −13.4% against a median of 32.8%. Consistency: percentile 12 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern? Based on: equity ratio −13.4% (median 32.8%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −14.5% (median 3.0%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak consistency, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
Royal House AS had an operating margin of 3.2% and an equity ratio of −13.4% in 2025, and ranks 16,283 of 20,337 in Bygg og anlegg.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from −155.9% to 3.2%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 16.9 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 12.7 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.6 | not meaningful |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. A mechanical estimate from public accounts with listed multiples and fixed adjustments. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −13.4% (median 32.8%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −14.5% (median 3.0%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 5.3% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2021, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2021, with a median operating margin of 1.8%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 40 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 78 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 42 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 12 | weight 15% |
Durability: 35 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Royal House AS?
The operating margin was 3.2% in 2025, against a median of 3.5% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 1.1%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Royal House AS?
The equity ratio was −13.4% in 2025 (median 32.8%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of Royal House AS like?
The current ratio was 2.44 in 2025 (median 1.41).
How does Royal House AS compare in Bygg og anlegg?
Royal House AS ranks 16,283 of 20,337 in Bygg og anlegg for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 10,109 of 12,867. Revenue changed by −0.1% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 925211850
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Bygg og anlegg (43.320)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 11 June 2020 6 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Skjetnemarkvegen 26, 7081 SJETNEMARKA (TRONDHEIM)
- Municipality
- Trondheim rank 3 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 26 September 2025
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Shareholders (2025)
- Number of shareholders
- 1 (one owner)
- Largest owner
- 100.0%
- Split
- companies 0% · private persons 100% · foreign 0%
- Owned from the same municipality
- 100%
- Group chain
- Ultimate owner: private person
The company is new in the shareholder register in 2025.
Source: the Norwegian Tax Administration's shareholder register as of 2025. Figures may be older than today's ownership. Private persons are not shown by name.
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 26 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 66 | 7 | 32 | |
| Rank | 4,839 | 19,117 | 16,283 | |
| Operating margin | 23.3% | −155.9% | 3.2% | |
| Return on assets | 22.7% | −60.8% | 1.1% | |
| Equity ratio | 38.5% | −9.8% | −13.4% | |
| Current ratio | 1.64 | 0.82 | 2.44 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −72.8% | −0.1% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 7.2 MNOK | 2.0 MNOK | 2.0 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 1.7 MNOK | −3.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 1.6 MNOK | −3.4 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK |
| Tax expense | 0.4 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 1.2 MNOK | −3.4 MNOK | −0.3 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.1 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Total assets | 7.4 MNOK | 5.0 MNOK | 5.9 MNOK |
| Current assets | 2.4 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Equity | 2.9 MNOK | −0.5 MNOK | −0.8 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 2.8 MNOK | −0.5 MNOK | −0.8 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 4.6 MNOK | 5.5 MNOK | 6.6 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 1.4 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 26 October 2026, accounts id 6602361.
Further
Similar companies
- Byggmester Ola Ravn Hassel AS index 32, rank 16,280 · compare
- Wwk Elektro AS index 32, rank 16,282 · compare
- Vaterbygg AS index 32, rank 16,285 · compare
- Snekkerstig AS index 32, rank 16,286 · compare
- Skånevikstrand AS index 32, rank 16,287 · compare