Katapult Accelerator AS
Score · fiscal year 2024
2of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 0 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 178 of 178 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 320 of 320 · Finans og forsikring
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2024, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 1 and solidity 0 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. Methodology
Against the sector
Katapult Accelerator AS is 48 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024.
Median score 50 among 178 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024: operating margin −425.9% (median 80.5%) and equity ratio −58.9% (median 90.3%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2 MNOK | 2 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −425.9% | 80.5% |
| Profit margin | −405.9% | 80.6% |
| Return on assets | −59.9% | 12.7% |
| Equity ratio | −58.9% | 90.3% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 0.10 |
| Current ratio | 0.48 | 6.74 |
| Revenue growth | −85.3% | 4.9% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2024. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 2, Katapult Accelerator AS does better than 0% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (178 companies) in 2024.
Score 2023–2025
- Katapult Accelerator AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
What the numbers say
Katapult Accelerator AS had an operating margin of −425.9% and an equity ratio of −58.9% in 2024, and ranks 320 of 320 in Finans og forsikring.
From 2023 to 2024: the operating margin fell from −42.1% to −425.9% and the equity ratio fell from 4.1% to −58.9%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2024 accounts.
Three simple methods
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | not meaningful |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −58.9% (median 90.3%).
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.1 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.48 (median 6.74).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −405.9% (median 80.6%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −425.9% (median 80.5%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 1.4% of the debt in 2024. The policy rate averaged 4.50 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- watch Extreme margin: check the figures
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2026, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2026, with a median operating margin of −13.5%. Based on the 6 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 1 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 3 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 0 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 6 | weight 15% |
Durability: 14 (average over 2 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Katapult Accelerator AS?
The operating margin was −425.9% in 2024, against a median of 80.5% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −59.9%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Katapult Accelerator AS?
The equity ratio was −58.9% in 2024 (median 90.3%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of Katapult Accelerator AS like?
The current ratio was 0.48 in 2024 (median 6.74). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does Katapult Accelerator AS compare in Finans og forsikring?
Katapult Accelerator AS ranks 320 of 320 in Finans og forsikring for 2024. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 178 of 178. Revenue changed by −85.3% from the year before.
Group accounts
The company is registered as part of a group, but we have no group accounts for it. Group accounts are filed by the parent company, and open data does not say which company that is.
Read the figures with care: a company in a group can look strong because of group contributions, or weak because dividends go up to the parent. The figures are indications, not the full picture.
We do not show the group structure, because open data does not say who owns whom.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 916787944
- Legal form
- AS · part of a group
- Sector
- Finans og forsikring (66.300)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 22 January 2016 10 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.06 MNOK
- Business address
- Universitetsgata 2, 0164 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 2 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 31 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 25 | 2 | 14 | |
| Rank | 265 | 320 | 341 | |
| Operating margin | −42.1% | −425.9% | −64.6% | |
| Return on assets | 113.2% | −59.9% | −26.7% | |
| Equity ratio | 4.1% | −58.9% | −113.9% | |
| Current ratio | 0.85 | 0.48 | 0.31 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −85.3% | 108.3% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 14.8 MNOK | 2.2 MNOK | 4.5 MNOK |
| Operating profit | −6.2 MNOK | −9.2 MNOK | −2.9 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 11.2 MNOK | −8.8 MNOK | −3.5 MNOK |
| Net profit | 11.2 MNOK | −8.8 MNOK | −3.5 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 1.2 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Total assets | 10.9 MNOK | 14.2 MNOK | 10.4 MNOK |
| Current assets | 6.4 MNOK | 9.7 MNOK | 6.1 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.4 MNOK | −8.3 MNOK | −11.8 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | – | −8.4 MNOK | −11.9 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 10.5 MNOK | 22.5 MNOK | 22.2 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 7.5 MNOK | 20.2 MNOK | 20.0 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 31 October 2026, accounts id 6057947.
Further
Similar companies
- Hybridge Mezzanine AS index 12, rank 315 · compare
- Lq-Invest AS index 12, rank 316 · compare
- WILLE & Sand Forsikringspartner AS index 11, rank 317 · compare
- Moreno AS index 10, rank 318 · compare
- Converto Forvaltning AS index 7, rank 319 · compare