Pumpa AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
61of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 71 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 3,281 of 11,289 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 6,689 of 22,952 · Handel
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 27 and solidity 87 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
Pumpa AS is 11 points above the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 11,286 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −2.3% (median 2.6%) and equity ratio 77.4% (median 33.5%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 4 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −2.3% | 2.6% |
| Profit margin | −2.0% | 2.1% |
| Return on assets | −2.9% | 6.1% |
| Equity ratio | 77.4% | 33.5% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.29 | 1.25 |
| Current ratio | 490.83 | 1.74 |
| Revenue growth | 16.2% | 4.0% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 61, Pumpa AS does better than 71% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (11,289 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- Pumpa AS
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
Pumpa AS has a score of 61 for 2025, rank 6,689 of 22,952 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 100 against peers, current ratio 490.83 against a median of 1.74. Solidity: percentile 87 against peers, equity ratio 77.4% against a median of 33.5%.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 27 against peers, operating margin −2.3% against a median of 2.6%. Consistency: percentile 35 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −2.0% (median 2.1%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak consistency, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
Pumpa AS had an operating margin of −2.3% and an equity ratio of 77.4% in 2025, and ranks 6,689 of 22,952 in Handel.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin rose from −11.7% to −2.3% and revenue grew by 16%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 1 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 1 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −2.0% (median 2.1%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 1.5%. Based on the 11 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 27 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 87 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 100 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 72 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 35 | weight 15% |
Durability: 57 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is Pumpa AS?
The operating margin was −2.3% in 2025, against a median of 2.6% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was −2.9%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is Pumpa AS?
The equity ratio was 77.4% in 2025 (median 33.5%). Debt-to-equity was 0.29 (median 1.25).
What is the liquidity of Pumpa AS like?
The current ratio was 490.83 in 2025 (median 1.74).
How does Pumpa AS compare in Handel?
Pumpa AS ranks 6,689 of 22,952 in Handel for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 3,281 of 11,289. Revenue changed by 16.2% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 915289452
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Handel (47.300)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 25 March 2015 11 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.60 MNOK
- Business address
- Sjøveien 41, 8517 NARVIK
- Municipality
- Narvik rank 16–25 of 27 in KOSTRA group 9
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 23 April 2015
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chair of the board
- Inger-Lise Sletten
- Board member
- Tore Haugen
- Board member
- Kjell Arne Sommerseth
- Board member
- Lars Ivar Strokkenes
- Board member
- Jan Helge Olsen
- Board member
- Geir Joar Storvik
- Deputy member
- Dag Erling Starup Moen
- Deputy member
- Ivar Iversen Fanghol
- Accountant
- Økoråd Narvik AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 26 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 59 | 51 | 61 | |
| Rank | 7,704 | 10,908 | 6,689 | |
| Operating margin | −4.4% | −11.7% | −2.3% | |
| Return on assets | −4.5% | −13.4% | −2.9% | |
| Equity ratio | 76.9% | 74.7% | 77.4% | |
| Current ratio | 45.16 | 517.63 | 490.83 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −0.4% | 16.2% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.0 MNOK | 1.0 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.0 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.0 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.0 MNOK | −0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | – | – | – |
| Total assets | 0.9 MNOK | 0.9 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.3 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.7 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.1 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 26 October 2026, accounts id 6502021.
Further
Similar companies
- Datasenteret Surnadal AS index 61, rank 6,685 · compare
- Maskegruppen AS index 61, rank 6,686 · compare
- Helsekost Leknes AS index 61, rank 6,687 · compare
- Kolbotn UR AS index 61, rank 6,691 · compare
- Dagligvareservice Nordvest AS index 61, rank 6,692 · compare