BYGG I VATER AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
47of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 43 % of small companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 18,710 of 32,582 · Bygg og anlegg
Profile
Elephant · Steward
Lower profitability, high solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 10 and solidity 65 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
BYGG I VATER AS is 3 points below the median for small companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 31,472 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin −13.1% (median 3.7%) and equity ratio 57.0% (median 36.5%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | −13.1% | 3.7% |
| Profit margin | −13.4% | 3.4% |
| Return on assets | −65.4% | 5.7% |
| Equity ratio | 57.0% | 36.5% |
| Debt-to-equity | 0.76 | 1.20 |
| Current ratio | 1.90 | 1.45 |
| Revenue growth | 24.1% | 3.0% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 47, BYGG I VATER AS does better than 43% of small companies in the same sector (31,720 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- BYGG I VATER AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
BYGG I VATER AS has a score of 47 for 2025, rank 18,710 of 32,582 in the sector.
Strongest: Growth: percentile 72 against peers, revenue growth 24.1% against a median of 3.0%. Solidity: percentile 65 against peers, equity ratio 57.0% against a median of 36.5%.
Weakest: Profitability: percentile 10 against peers, operating margin −13.1% against a median of 3.7%.
Worth a closer look
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −13.4% (median 3.4%).
- The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors? Based on: operating margin −13.1% (median 3.7%).
- What lies behind weak profitability, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
BYGG I VATER AS had an operating margin of −13.1% and an equity ratio of 57.0% in 2025, and ranks 18,710 of 32,582 in Bygg og anlegg.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from 9.2% to −13.1% and went from a profit to a loss before tax.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
One method gives a figure: 0 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | not meaningful |
| P/B | 1.0 | 0 MNOK |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −13.4% (median 3.4%).
- watch
The operating margin is lower than at three in four companies in the sector. Where do costs differ from competitors?
Based on: Operating margin −13.1% (median 3.7%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 3.6% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
No anomalies found in the figures.
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 2.5%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 10 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 65 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 64 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 72 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 47 | weight 15% |
Durability: 59 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is BYGG I VATER AS?
The operating margin was −13.1% in 2025, against a median of 3.7% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was −65.4%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is BYGG I VATER AS?
The equity ratio was 57.0% in 2025 (median 36.5%). Debt-to-equity was 0.76 (median 1.20).
What is the liquidity of BYGG I VATER AS like?
The current ratio was 1.90 in 2025 (median 1.45).
How does BYGG I VATER AS compare in Bygg og anlegg?
BYGG I VATER AS ranks 18,710 of 32,582 in Bygg og anlegg for 2025. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 18,064 of 31,720. Revenue changed by 24.1% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 912407861
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Bygg og anlegg (41.000)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 2 August 2013 13 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.03 MNOK
- Business address
- Eivind Jarls gate 27, 4632 KRISTIANSAND S
- Municipality
- Kristiansand rank 2–6 of 11 in KOSTRA group 12
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 21 September 2013
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chief executive
- Øystein Breivik
- Chair of the board
- Øystein Breivik
- Deputy member
- Ann Florelyn Breivik
- Accountant
- ENORA AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 25 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 26 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 75 | 56 | 47 | |
| Rank | 3,410 | 12,043 | 18,710 | |
| Operating margin | 6.9% | 9.2% | −13.1% | |
| Return on assets | 38.8% | 15.6% | −65.4% | |
| Equity ratio | 61.2% | 52.0% | 57.0% | |
| Current ratio | 3.30 | 2.11 | 1.90 | |
| Revenue growth | – | −58.9% | 24.1% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2.7 MNOK | 1.1 MNOK | 1.4 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.2 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | −0.2 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Total assets | 0.5 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.4 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Equity | 0.3 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | 0.2 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 0.2 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.1 MNOK | 0.3 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 26 October 2026, accounts id 6717290.
Further
Similar companies
- E&E SERVICE AS index 47, rank 18,708 · compare
- ELTERA LILLEHAMMER AS index 47, rank 18,709 · compare
- KYDLAND MASKIN AS index 47, rank 18,711 · compare
- RB MONTASJE AS index 47, rank 18,712 · compare
- JENSEN SNEKKER OG TØMRERSERVICE AS index 47, rank 18,713 · compare