AS VILLABYGG I
Score · fiscal year 2025
37of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 29 % of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank in the Morning class Micro: 826 of 1,159 · What are Morning company classes?
Place in the whole sector: 1,244 of 1,691 · Annen tjenesteyting
Profile
Beaver · Builder
Lower profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 47 and solidity 0 out of 100 among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
AS VILLABYGG I is 12 points below the median for companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 49 among 1,158 companies.
Against companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 5.2% (median 3.3%) and equity ratio −194.0% (median 32.5%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 5.2% | 3.3% |
| Profit margin | −19.3% | 3.0% |
| Return on assets | 4.1% | 9.0% |
| Equity ratio | −194.0% | 32.5% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 1.37 |
| Current ratio | 2.69 | 1.47 |
| Revenue growth | 2.5% | 3.7% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 37, AS VILLABYGG I does better than 29% of companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector (1,159 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- AS VILLABYGG I
- Median: companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector
AS VILLABYGG I has a score of 37 for 2025, rank 1,244 of 1,691 in the sector.
Strongest: Liquidity: percentile 82 against peers, current ratio 2.69 against a median of 1.47.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 0 against peers, equity ratio −194.0% against a median of 32.5%. Consistency: percentile 26 against peers.
Worth a closer look
- Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern? Based on: equity ratio −194.0% (median 32.5%).
- The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern? Based on: profit margin −19.3% (median 3.0%).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
- What lies behind weak consistency, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
AS VILLABYGG I had an operating margin of 5.2% and an equity ratio of −194.0% in 2025, and ranks 1,244 of 1,691 in Annen tjenesteyting.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from 25.8% to 5.2% and the equity ratio rose from −227.4% to −194.0%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | not meaningful |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | debt above value |
| P/B | 1.0 | not meaningful |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −194.0% (median 32.5%).
- watch
The company made a loss before tax. Are these one-off items or a pattern?
Based on: Profit margin −19.3% (median 3.0%).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 5.7% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
See interest rates, prices and exchange rates for the sector
Data quality
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of −0.2%. Based on the 9 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 47 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 82 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 46 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 26 | weight 15% |
Durability: 44 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is AS VILLABYGG I?
The operating margin was 5.2% in 2025, against a median of 3.3% among companies in the Morning class Micro in the same sector. Return on assets was 4.1%. The company made a loss before tax.
How solid is AS VILLABYGG I?
The equity ratio was −194.0% in 2025 (median 32.5%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of AS VILLABYGG I like?
The current ratio was 2.69 in 2025 (median 1.47).
How does AS VILLABYGG I compare in Annen tjenesteyting?
AS VILLABYGG I ranks 1,244 of 1,691 in Annen tjenesteyting for 2025. Among companies in the Morning class Micro it is number 826 of 1,159. Revenue changed by 2.5% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 834852152
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Annen tjenesteyting (97.001)
- Morning company class
- Micro
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 30 September 1947 79 years in operation
- Share capital
- 0.23 MNOK
- Business address
- v/OBOS Eiendomsforvaltning AS, Hammersborg torg 1, 0179 OSLO
- Municipality
- Oslo rank 63–220 of 357 in Norway
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
Loading roles …
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 1 November 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 30 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 48 | 48 | 37 | |
| Rank | 852 | 895 | 1,244 | |
| Operating margin | 32.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | |
| Return on assets | 24.4% | 21.5% | 4.1% | |
| Equity ratio | −207.1% | −227.4% | −194.0% | |
| Current ratio | 5.10 | 7.12 | 2.69 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 0.4% | 2.5% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 2.1 MNOK | 2.1 MNOK | 2.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.7 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.2 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.2 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK | −0.4 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.5 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK | 0.6 MNOK |
| Total assets | 2.9 MNOK | 2.6 MNOK | 3.3 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.7 MNOK | 0.5 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK |
| Equity | −6.0 MNOK | −6.0 MNOK | −6.4 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −6.2 MNOK | −6.2 MNOK | −6.6 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 8.8 MNOK | 8.6 MNOK | 9.7 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.4 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 30 October 2026, accounts id 6682752.
Further
Similar companies
- Royal Haircut AS index 37, rank 1,242 · compare
- La Lash AS index 37, rank 1,245 · compare
- Altera AS index 37, rank 1,247 · compare
- NK Frisører AS index 37, rank 1,248 · compare
- FOT & Helse AS index 37, rank 1,249 · compare