PROSJEKT 33 AS
Score · fiscal year 2025
36of 100
How to read this: the company is ahead of 27 % of small companies in the same sector in 2025. What does this mean?
Rank: 24,135 of 32,581 · Bygg og anlegg
Profile
Cheetah · Sprinter
High profitability, lower solidity
Position against comparable companies in 2025, not a verdict on the company. Based on profitability 70 and solidity 0 out of 100 among small companies in the same sector in 2025. Methodology
Against the sector
PROSJEKT 33 AS is 14 points below the median for small companies in the same sector in 2025.
Median score 50 among 31,471 companies.
Against small companies in the same sector in 2025: operating margin 55.9% (median 3.7%) and equity ratio −6.0% (median 36.5%).
The numbers behind the score
| Measure | Company | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1 MNOK | 3 MNOK |
| Operating margin | 55.9% | 3.7% |
| Profit margin | 0.8% | 3.4% |
| Return on assets | 2.9% | 5.7% |
| Equity ratio | −6.0% | 36.5% |
| Debt-to-equity | – | 1.20 |
| Current ratio | 0.34 | 1.45 |
| Revenue growth | −4.8% | 3.0% |
The median and “ahead of” refer to small companies in the same sector in 2025. The bar shows the share of companies the figure is ahead of.
With an index of 36, PROSJEKT 33 AS does better than 27% of small companies in the same sector (31,719 companies) in 2025.
Score 2023–2025
- PROSJEKT 33 AS
- Median: small companies in the same sector
PROSJEKT 33 AS has a score of 36 for 2025, rank 24,135 of 32,581 in the sector.
Strongest: Profitability: percentile 70 against peers, operating margin 55.9% against a median of 3.7%.
Weakest: Solidity: percentile 0 against peers, equity ratio −6.0% against a median of 36.5%. Liquidity: percentile 10 against peers, current ratio 0.34 against a median of 1.45.
Worth a closer look
- Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern? Based on: equity ratio −6.0% (median 36.5%).
- Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.9 times current assets. Based on: current ratio 0.34 (median 1.45).
- What lies behind weak solidity, and will it last?
Written by fixed rules from the figures. Describes the figures, does not explain causes. Not investment or financial advice. How the summary is made
What the numbers say
PROSJEKT 33 AS had an operating margin of 55.9% and an equity ratio of −6.0% in 2025, and ranks 24,135 of 32,581 in Bygg og anlegg.
From 2024 to 2025: the operating margin fell from 65.4% to 55.9%.
This text is generated automatically from the 2025 accounts.
Three simple methods
The methods give between 0 MNOK and 5 MNOK.
| Method | Multiple | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| P/E | 10.0 | 0 MNOK |
| EV/EBIT | 8.0 | 5 MNOK |
| P/B | 1.0 | not meaningful |
A mechanical estimate from public accounts, not advice. Mechanical estimate from public accounts with fixed multiples. Not a valuation and not advice to buy or sell. The multiples are provisional default values and must be adjusted per sector before the figures are used for anything. See the calculation
Worth a closer look
- critical
Equity is negative. How will it be rebuilt, and what do lenders and the auditor say about going concern?
Based on: Equity ratio −6.0% (median 36.5%).
- critical
Consider strengthening liquidity: current liabilities are 2.9 times current assets.
Based on: Current ratio 0.34 (median 1.45).
Indications based on the latest annual accounts from open data. Not investment or financial advice.
Financial costs were 2.7% of the debt in 2025. The policy rate averaged 4.30 % the same year. This is a plain description of what the debt cost, not a model of interest sensitivity.
Data quality
- critical Negative equity
Scenario analysis: the sector's weakest year
We have no accounts for 2022, the sector's weakest year, for this company.
The sector's weakest year was 2022, with a median operating margin of 2.4%. Based on the 10 fiscal years we have. The analysis grows as more years are fetched or imported. Methodology
What the score is made of
| Profitability | 70 | weight 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Solidity | 0 | weight 25% |
| Liquidity | 10 | weight 15% |
| Growth | 39 | weight 15% |
| Consistency | 52 | weight 15% |
Durability: 36 (average over 3 years)
Index version 2. Data completeness 100%: the share of the weights that had data.
Questions and answers
How profitable is PROSJEKT 33 AS?
The operating margin was 55.9% in 2025, against a median of 3.7% among small companies in the same sector. Return on assets was 2.9%.
How solid is PROSJEKT 33 AS?
The equity ratio was −6.0% in 2025 (median 36.5%). Equity is negative, so liabilities exceed assets.
What is the liquidity of PROSJEKT 33 AS like?
The current ratio was 0.34 in 2025 (median 1.45). Current assets did not cover current liabilities.
How does PROSJEKT 33 AS compare in Bygg og anlegg?
PROSJEKT 33 AS ranks 24,135 of 32,581 in Bygg og anlegg for 2025. Among companies of the same size (small companies) it ranks 23,257 of 31,719. Revenue changed by −4.8% from the year before.
From the Central Coordinating Register
- Org. no.
- 817095682
- Legal form
- AS
- Sector
- Bygg og anlegg (41.000)
- Size tier
- small
- Employees
- 0–4 (not registered)
- Founded
- 11 April 2016 10 years in operation
- Share capital
- 3.01 MNOK
- Business address
- Vestrevei 1, 1710 SARPSBORG
- Municipality
- Sarpsborg rank 10 of 10 in KOSTRA group 11
- Audit
- Audit opted out from 1 December 2020
- Latest accounts filed
- 2025
Source: Central Coordinating Register, Brønnøysund Register Centre. The employee count is reported by the company and may be older than the accounts. See the company at the Brønnøysund Register Centre
Ownership and roles
- Chair of the board
- Petter Witnes
- Board member
- Maksims Ponomarenko
- Accountant
- ALL-REGNSKAPSERVICE AS
Source: Central Coordinating Register, fetched 29 October 2026. Only names are shown.
Owners and shareholdings will appear here once the shareholder data extract is in place.
Coming · not built yet
Error in the data?
Do you see an error in the figures or in how the company is mapped (sector, holding, group)? Let us know. Corrections require documentation.
Figures last fetched 26 October 2026.
Year by year · 2023–2025
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 31 | 40 | 36 | |
| Rank | 22,231 | 21,267 | 24,135 | |
| Operating margin | 69.3% | 65.4% | 55.9% | |
| Return on assets | 3.6% | 3.6% | 2.9% | |
| Equity ratio | −6.7% | −6.1% | −6.0% | |
| Current ratio | 0.52 | 0.82 | 0.34 | |
| Revenue growth | – | 4.1% | −4.8% |
Accounts
From the Brønnøysund Register Centre, in the company's reporting currency (NOK).
| Key figure | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | 1.2 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK | 1.2 MNOK |
| Operating profit | 0.8 MNOK | 0.8 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Profit before tax | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Net profit | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK | 0.0 MNOK |
| Financial expenses | 0.7 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK | 0.7 MNOK |
| Total assets | 22.7 MNOK | 22.7 MNOK | 22.6 MNOK |
| Current assets | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK |
| Equity | −1.5 MNOK | −1.4 MNOK | −1.4 MNOK |
| Retained earnings | −1.6 MNOK | −1.5 MNOK | −1.5 MNOK |
| Total liabilities | 24.2 MNOK | 24.1 MNOK | 24.0 MNOK |
| Current liabilities | 0.1 MNOK | 0.1 MNOK | 0.2 MNOK |
Source: Brønnøysund Register Centre (Register of Company Accounts), fetched 26 October 2026, accounts id 6360667.
Further
Similar companies
- SLAGEN ELEKTRISKE AS index 36, rank 24,134 · compare
- BYGGMESTERN MØRE AS index 36, rank 24,136 · compare
- SØR-TROMS ELEKTRO AS index 36, rank 24,137 · compare
- K-R INVEST AS index 36, rank 24,138 · compare
- JOHAN AASLAND AS index 36, rank 24,139 · compare