Supplier assessment

Skanska Norge AS

Org. no. 943049467 · Bygg og anlegg · OSLO · 2,918 employees

Grade B Solid basis

Points76 of 100, weighted

Public contracts24 last 5 years, 14 different buyers

Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, the register status and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Assessment · written from fixed rules

Skanska Norge AS gets grade B on the figures.

The accounts are solid in most areas, with a few points worth a look.

Strengths

The equity ratio is 32.0%, which gives a good buffer against losses.
The company has won 24 public contracts from 14 different buyers in the last 5 years.

Risks

The largest contract is large compared with revenue.

Questions to ask

Clarify capacity: staffing, subcontractors and other commitments.

This text is put together from fixed sentences. An AI-generated assessment follows once it has been written and checked.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
Area	Points (0–100)	Weight	Basis
Solidity	88	30 %	Equity ratio 32.0%
Liquidity	59	20 %	Current ratio 1.06
Profitability	84	20 %	Operating margin 2.7%
Size and capacity	15	10 %	Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts
Experience from public contracts	100	20 %	Contracts and buyers in the last 5 years

Contracts won in the last 5 years

24 contracts from 14 different buyers, 40,239.8 MNOK in total where the value is given. 1 of them had only one tender.

Contracts won in the last 5 years
Date	Buyer	Contract	Value
11 September 2026	Statens vegvesen	E16 Lærdalstunnelen - tunneloppgradering	0.0 MNOK
9 March 2026	STATSBYGG	Prosjekt 1304001 Stortinget – rehabilitering tilbygg mot Akersgata...	500.0 MNOK
12 January 2026	Helse Sør-Øst RHF	Kontrakt 2041 Totalentreprise med samspill F2 - Nye Rikshospitalet	23.8 MNOK
4 June 2025	Oslo kommune v/ Fornebubanen	Skøyen stasjon (K10)	1,701.0 MNOK
27 May 2025	Statens vegvesen	E6 Megården -Sommerset	4,359.7 MNOK
12 May 2025	Hol kommune	Geilo barne- og ungdomsskole - samspillsentreprise	264.8 MNOK
12 February 2025	Bane NOR SF	Kontrollingeniør geomatikk og geomatikkarbeider	–
12 February 2025	Bane NOR SF	Kontrollingeniør geomatikk og geomatikkarbeider	–
12 February 2025	Bane NOR SF	Kontrollingeniør geomatikk og geomatikkarbeider	–
12 February 2025	Bane NOR SF	Kontrollingeniør geomatikk og geomatikkarbeider	–

Source: Doffin (DFØ), NLOD 2.0. The latest ten contracts are shown.

To the company page Order a competitor analysis

Method

The grade is computed by fixed rules. Each area gets points from 0 to 100, and the points are weighted. Between the thresholds the points run smoothly, so a company with 38 % equity gets nearly the same as one with 40 %, not a whole step less. A missing area is left out and its weight shared among the rest. A is 80 points or more, B 65, C 50, D 35, and E below that.

Solidity (30 %): equity ratio. 0 % gives 25 points, 10 % gives 45, 20 % gives 65, 30 % gives 85 and 40 % or more gives 100, smoothly in between. Negative equity gives 0.
Liquidity (20 %): current ratio. 0.5 gives 10 points, 0.8 gives 40, 1.0 gives 55, 1.2 gives 70, 1.5 gives 85 and 2.0 or more gives 100, smoothly in between.
Profitability (20 %): average of operating and profit margin. 0 % gives 55 points, 5 % gives 80 and 10 % or more gives 100, smoothly in between. A negative margin gives 15.
Size and capacity (10 %): the largest Doffin contract against revenue. Under 10 % gives 100 points, under 30 % gives 70, under 60 % gives 40, otherwise 15. Without contracts revenue counts: 1 MNOK gives 50, 10 MNOK gives 70, 50 MNOK gives 85 and 1,000 MNOK or more gives 100, smoothly in between.
Experience from public contracts (20 %): contracts won in Doffin in the last five years. 10 or more gives 100 points, 3 gives 85 and 1 gives 65. Contracts from at least three different buyers give 10 points extra. No contracts do not count: many sound companies do not sell to the public sector, so the area is left out and its weight shared among the rest.

Hard signals override: bankruptcy or winding-up gives E, negative equity at most D, and missing annual accounts at most C.

The written assessment is written by artificial intelligence from the same figures and labelled «AI-generated». Every number in it is checked against the database before it is shown; if the check fails, text put together from fixed rules is shown. AI does not set the grade.

The assessment is an indication based on public data: the latest annual accounts from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and contracts in Doffin. It is not a credit rating and not advice to choose or reject a supplier. The page is not indexed by search engines.