Supplier assessment

SKIFER & Granitt AS

Org. no. 893108572 · Handel · OSLO

Grade A Very solid basis

Points80 of 100, weighted

Public contracts0 last 5 years, 0 different buyers

Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, the register status and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Assessment · AI-generated

SKIFER & Granitt AS holds grade A (score 80 out of 100), driven by top points for solidity, liquidity and profitability, while capacity and experience score lower.

The 2025 accounts show an equity ratio of 80.3% against an industry median of 33.5%, a current ratio of 5.08 and an operating margin of 66.7% against a median of 2.6%. Revenue is small at 0.4 MNOK and fell by −28.6%, and capacity (25 points) and experience (40 points) score well below the other areas. The figures describe financial standing, not whether the company can deliver a specific contract.

Strengths

Solidity scores 100 points, with an equity ratio of 80.3% compared with an industry median of 33.5%.
Liquidity scores 100 points, with a current ratio of 5.08.
Profitability scores 100 points, with an operating margin of 66.7% and a profit margin of 72.4%.
The company was founded in 2008 and no hard signals are registered.

Risks

Revenue is 0.4 MNOK and declined by −28.6%, so the high margins rest on a very small turnover.
Capacity scores only 25 points and the number of employees is not reported, so delivery capacity cannot be read from the figures.
Experience scores 40 points, and no public contracts were won in the last 5 years, so there is no public-sector track record in the data.
The company is not part of a group, so no parent company support is indicated.

Questions to ask

Can the supplier document staffing and capacity to deliver the contract volume in question?
Can the supplier provide references from comparable private or public deliveries?
Would the supplier supply updated or interim accounts to show how revenue has developed since 2025?
If the contract is large relative to 0.4 MNOK in revenue, would a bank guarantee or other security be appropriate?

This text was written by artificial intelligence (AI) on 4 November 2026 from the figures on this page. Every number in it has been checked against the database. AI can still phrase things imprecisely: read it as a starting point, not a conclusion.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
Area	Points (0–100)	Weight	Basis
Solidity	100	30 %	Equity ratio 80.3%
Liquidity	100	20 %	Current ratio 5.08
Profitability	100	20 %	Operating margin 66.7%
Size and capacity	25	10 %	Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts
Experience from public contracts	40	20 %	Contracts and buyers in the last 5 years

Contracts won in the last 5 years

We find no contracts in Doffin in the last 5 years. The company may not have supplied the public sector, or its contracts were below the thresholds.

To the company page Order a competitor analysis

Method

The grade is computed by fixed rules. Each area gets 0 to 100 points from published thresholds, and the points are weighted. A missing area is left out and its weight shared by the rest. A is 80 points or more, B 65, C 50, D 35, and E below that.

Solidity (30 %): equity ratio. 40% or more gives 100 points, 30% gives 85, 20% gives 65, 10% gives 45, 0% gives 25, and negative equity gives 0.
Liquidity (20 %): current ratio. 2.0 or more gives 100 points, 1.5 gives 85, 1.2 gives 65, 1.0 gives 45, and below 1.0 gives 15.
Profitability (20 %): average of operating margin and profit margin. 10% or more gives 100 points, 5% gives 80, 0% gives 55, and a negative margin gives 15.
Size and capacity (10 %): the largest contract in Doffin against revenue. Below 10% gives 100 points, below 30% gives 70, below 60% gives 40, otherwise 15. Without contracts, revenue counts: NOK 50m gives 85, NOK 10m gives 70, NOK 1m gives 50.
Experience from public contracts (20 %): contracts won in Doffin in the last five years. 10 or more give 100 points, 3 give 85, 1 gives 65, and none gives 40. Contracts from at least three different buyers add 10 points.

Hard signals override: bankruptcy or winding-up gives E, negative equity at most D, and missing annual accounts at most C.

The written assessment is written by artificial intelligence from the same figures and labelled «AI-generated». Every number in it is checked against the database before it is shown; if the check fails, text put together from fixed rules is shown. AI does not set the grade.

The assessment is an indication based on public data: the latest annual accounts from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and contracts in Doffin. It is not a credit rating and not advice to choose or reject a supplier. The page is not indexed by search engines.