Supplier assessment

Ringebu Park AS

Org. no. 823136102 · Eiendom · ULLENSAKER

Grade D Weak, needs clarification

Points36 of 100, weighted

Public contracts0 last 5 years, 0 different buyers

Fiscal year2025 Latest annual accounts we have

Negative equity: the grade cannot be better than D.

The grade is computed by fixed rules from the accounts, the register status and the contracts in Doffin. It is not made by AI.

Assessment · AI-generated

Ringebu Park AS has grade D, set by negative equity and weak profitability, while its short-term liquidity figure is strong.

The company scores 36 out of 100 and ranks no. 7,050 of 7,274 in the sector on the Morning index. Solidity scores 0 points and profitability 15, while liquidity scores 100. The figures describe the 2025 accounts only and cannot show what lies behind the negative equity or the operating loss.

Strengths

The current ratio is 9.96, and liquidity scores 100 points out of 100.
The company was founded in 2019 and reports revenue of 6.9 MNOK for 2025.
Capacity scores 50 points and experience 40 points, which is mid-range.

Risks

The equity ratio is −18.4% against an industry median of 27.0%, and negative equity means the grade cannot be better than D.
The operating margin is −20.1% against an industry median of 48.2%, and the profit margin is also −20.1%.
The company has no registered public contracts in the last 5 years, so there is no public-sector track record to review.
The company has opted out of audit, so the accounts have not been independently audited.

Questions to ask

Could the supplier provide a parent company guarantee or a bank guarantee to cover the negative equity?
Can the supplier provide updated accounts or interim figures showing how equity and operating result have developed since 2025?
Could the supplier provide references from comparable private-sector assignments, given that there are no public contracts?
Can the supplier document its capacity to deliver, including staffing, as the number of employees is not reported?

This text was written by artificial intelligence (AI) on 4 November 2026 from the figures on this page. Every number in it has been checked against the database. AI can still phrase things imprecisely: read it as a starting point, not a conclusion.

How the grade is set

How the grade is set
Area	Points (0–100)	Weight	Basis
Solidity	0	30 %	Equity ratio −18.4%
Liquidity	100	20 %	Current ratio 9.96
Profitability	15	20 %	Operating margin −20.1%
Size and capacity	50	10 %	Largest contract against revenue, or revenue when there are no contracts
Experience from public contracts	40	20 %	Contracts and buyers in the last 5 years

Contracts won in the last 5 years

We find no contracts in Doffin in the last 5 years. The company may not have supplied the public sector, or its contracts were below the thresholds.

To the company page Order a competitor analysis

Method

The grade is computed by fixed rules. Each area gets 0 to 100 points from published thresholds, and the points are weighted. A missing area is left out and its weight shared by the rest. A is 80 points or more, B 65, C 50, D 35, and E below that.

Solidity (30 %): equity ratio. 40% or more gives 100 points, 30% gives 85, 20% gives 65, 10% gives 45, 0% gives 25, and negative equity gives 0.
Liquidity (20 %): current ratio. 2.0 or more gives 100 points, 1.5 gives 85, 1.2 gives 65, 1.0 gives 45, and below 1.0 gives 15.
Profitability (20 %): average of operating margin and profit margin. 10% or more gives 100 points, 5% gives 80, 0% gives 55, and a negative margin gives 15.
Size and capacity (10 %): the largest contract in Doffin against revenue. Below 10% gives 100 points, below 30% gives 70, below 60% gives 40, otherwise 15. Without contracts, revenue counts: NOK 50m gives 85, NOK 10m gives 70, NOK 1m gives 50.
Experience from public contracts (20 %): contracts won in Doffin in the last five years. 10 or more give 100 points, 3 give 85, 1 gives 65, and none gives 40. Contracts from at least three different buyers add 10 points.

Hard signals override: bankruptcy or winding-up gives E, negative equity at most D, and missing annual accounts at most C.

The written assessment is written by artificial intelligence from the same figures and labelled «AI-generated». Every number in it is checked against the database before it is shown; if the check fails, text put together from fixed rules is shown. AI does not set the grade.

The assessment is an indication based on public data: the latest annual accounts from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and contracts in Doffin. It is not a credit rating and not advice to choose or reject a supplier. The page is not indexed by search engines.