Most and least satisfied youth

The share of lower secondary pupils who say they are satisfied with their health, from the municipality's latest Ungdata survey.

Nore og Uvdal has the highest share satisfied with their health of Norway's municipalities at 80.1% (2025). The lowest is Balsfjord at 49.0%. Source: FHI, indicator 349, processed by Morning Analytics 2 November 2026.

Download the table (CSV) Sharing image (PNG)

80.1%Highest: Nore og Uvdal
64.7%Median of the municipalities
49.0%Lowest: Balsfjord

Analysis: why are some at the top and others at the bottom?

We compared share satisfied with their health with every other municipal figure we have, from Statistics Norway, NIPH and the Brønnøysund Register Centre. Below are the figures that go most closely together with share satisfied with their health across the country, and what marks the municipalities at the top and bottom on those figures.

The pattern across the country

The highest and the lowest

  • No. 1 Nore og Uvdal (80.1%) Fits the pattern: «New enterprises per 1,000 inhabitants» 15.29 per 1,000 (no. 14 of 355 from the top; Statistics Norway table 13701); «Pupils at mastery levels 3–5, national numeracy test, year 8» 73.3% (no. 41 of 288 from the top; Statistics Norway table 12255); «Completed upper secondary education (standardised)» 84.1% (no. 60 of 269 from the top; NIPH indicator 623). Most distinctive industry: produksjon av metallvarer, unntatt maskiner og utstyr, 5% of the jobs, 6.0 times the national share (Statistics Norway table 13470, 2025).
  • No. 2 Sauda (79.5%) Fits the pattern: «Completed upper secondary education (standardised)» 85.8% (no. 38 of 269 from the top; NIPH indicator 623). Most distinctive industry: produksjon av metaller, 10% of the jobs, 27.5 times the national share (Statistics Norway table 13470, 2025).
  • No. 3 Sogndal (76.9%) Fits the pattern: «Share with lower secondary as highest education (16 and over)» 17.8% (no. 353 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 09429); «Completed upper secondary education (standardised)» 86.0% (no. 35 of 269 from the top; NIPH indicator 623); «Pupils at mastery levels 3–5, national numeracy test, year 8» 73.0% (no. 46 of 288 from the top; Statistics Norway table 12255). Most distinctive industry: offentlig administrasjon og forsvar, og trygdeordninger underlagt offentlig forvaltning, 15% of the jobs, 2.3 times the national share (Statistics Norway table 13470, 2025).
  • No. 257 Balsfjord (49.0%, among the lowest) Fits the pattern: «Share with lower secondary as highest education (16 and over)» 32.8% (no. 25 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 09429); «Pupils at mastery levels 3–5, national numeracy test, year 8» 50.0% (no. 260 of 288 from the top; Statistics Norway table 12255); «Completed upper secondary education (standardised)» 73.8% (no. 230 of 269 from the top; NIPH indicator 623). Most distinctive industry: jordbruk og tjenester tilknyttet jordbruk, jakt og viltstell, 7% of the jobs, 5.9 times the national share (Statistics Norway table 13470, 2025).
  • No. 256 Kvæfjord (52.3%, among the lowest) Fits the pattern: «New enterprises per 1,000 inhabitants» 5.23 per 1,000 (no. 339 of 355 from the top; Statistics Norway table 13701). Goes against the pattern: «Pupils at mastery levels 3–5, national numeracy test, year 8» 70.4% (no. 66 of 288 from the top; Statistics Norway table 12255). Most distinctive industry: pleie- og omsorgstjenester i institusjon, 28% of the jobs, 5.1 times the national share (Statistics Norway table 13470, 2025).
  • No. 255 Frøya (53.4%, among the lowest) Fits the pattern: «Pupils at mastery levels 3–5, national numeracy test, year 8» 45.8% (no. 274 of 288 from the top; Statistics Norway table 12255); «Completed upper secondary education (standardised)» 73.5% (no. 232 of 269 from the top; NIPH indicator 623); «Share with lower secondary as highest education (16 and over)» 30.1% (no. 53 of 357 from the top; Statistics Norway table 09429). Most distinctive industry: fiske, fangst og akvakultur, 22% of the jobs, 26.9 times the national share (Statistics Norway table 13470, 2025).

The analysis describes what goes together, not what causes what. Two figures can follow each other because both depend on something else, such as size, location or industry. The figures are from the latest year available for each source, so the years can differ. Rank correlation runs from −1 to 1; values near 1 mean the municipalities lie in roughly the same order on both measures.

What explains the placing?

  • 1. Nore og Uvdal 80.1% Small municipality (2,459 inhabitants): one company or a few people can move the figure a lot. 24% above the median of the municipalities.
  • 2. Sauda 79.5% Small municipality (4,603 inhabitants): one company or a few people can move the figure a lot. 23% above the median of the municipalities.
  • 3. Sogndal 76.9% 19% above the median of the municipalities.
  • 255. Frøya 53.4% 17% below the median of the municipalities.
  • 256. Kvæfjord 52.3% Small municipality (2,901 inhabitants): one company or a few people can move the figure a lot. 19% below the median of the municipalities.
  • 257. Balsfjord 49.0% 24% below the median of the municipalities.
#Municipality County Inhabitants share satisfied with their health
1 Nore og Uvdalsmall municipality Buskerud 2,459 80.1%
2 Saudasmall municipality Rogaland 4,603 79.5%
3 Sogndal Vestland 12,552 76.9%
4 Hemsedalsmall municipality Buskerud 2,707 76.1%
5 Nord-Aurdal Innlandet 6,424 75.4%
6 Hole Buskerud 7,205 75.4%
7 Markersmall municipality Østfold 3,647 74.0%
8 Vinjesmall municipality Telemark 3,829 73.5%
9 Lundsmall municipality Rogaland 3,229 73.5%
10 Viksmall municipality Vestland 2,532 73.2%
11 Høyangersmall municipality Vestland 3,883 73.2%
12 Nittedal Akershus 26,032 73.0%
13 Frostasmall municipality Trøndelag - Trööndelage 2,667 73.0%
14 Time Rogaland 20,461 72.8%
15 Overhallasmall municipality Trøndelag - Trööndelage 3,944 72.7%
16 Tokkesmall municipality Telemark 2,242 72.6%
17 Oslo Oslo - Oslove 728,714 72.4%
18 Drangedalsmall municipality Telemark 4,056 72.3%
19 Tingvollsmall municipality Møre og Romsdal 3,066 71.9%
20 Golsmall municipality Buskerud 4,902 71.9%
21 Gausdal Innlandet 6,147 71.4%
22 Østre Toten Innlandet 14,925 71.2%
23 Nome Telemark 6,529 71.0%
24 Strandasmall municipality Møre og Romsdal 4,333 70.9%
25 Suldalsmall municipality Rogaland 3,891 70.5%
26 Steigensmall municipality Nordland - Nordlánnda 2,679 70.2%
27 Lyngdal Agder 10,922 70.1%
28 Herøy (Møre og Romsdal) Møre og Romsdal 9,003 70.1%
29 Skaun Trøndelag - Trööndelage 8,574 70.1%
30 Vegårsheismall municipality Agder 2,253 70.0%
31 Midtre Gauldal Trøndelag - Trööndelage 6,088 70.0%
32 Bærum Akershus 133,228 69.9%
33 Ås Akershus 22,725 69.7%
34 Gjerstadsmall municipality Agder 2,502 69.7%
35 Bjerkreimsmall municipality Rogaland 2,894 69.7%
36 Lørenskog Akershus 51,511 69.6%
37 Hjelmelandsmall municipality Rogaland 2,612 69.4%
38 Jevnaker Akershus 7,040 69.4%
39 Fjalersmall municipality Vestland 2,948 69.3%
40 Ringerike Buskerud 31,942 69.2%
41 Stryn Vestland 7,319 69.0%
42 Molde Møre og Romsdal 33,291 68.9%
43 Kristiansand Agder 119,287 68.9%
44 Gloppen Vestland 5,976 68.8%
45 Oppdal Trøndelag - Trööndelage 7,421 68.8%
46 Gjesdal Rogaland 12,715 68.6%
47 Lillehammer Innlandet 29,669 68.5%
48 Åmotsmall municipality Innlandet 4,191 68.4%
49 Rælingen Akershus 20,904 68.4%
50 Hitra Trøndelag - Trööndelage 5,568 68.3%

Not available for 100 municipalities (hidden by the source, too small or not measured): Aremark, Aurland, Beiarn, Berlevåg, Bindal, Bokn, Bygland, Bykle, Båtsfjord, Bø, Dovre, Dyrøy …