Bergverk og utvinning ranking 2024

Press mode: top and bottom with source credit

Benchmarks · fiscal year 2024

Quartiles among the 117 ranked companies, all sizes. Half of them lie between the lower and upper quartile.

Key figureLower quartileMedianUpper quartile
Operating margin−0.7%6.0%12.5%
Profit margin−2.6%5.2%13.8%
Return on assets0.5%6.9%14.2%
Equity ratio23.5%39.7%60.7%
Debt-to-equity0.551.272.54
Current ratio1.291.912.94
Revenue growth−10.2%2.5%23.2%

Ranked per Morning company class: Micro: 44 · Small: 37 · Medium: 30 · Large: 6. Morning company classes by revenue: Micro 1–10 MNOK, Small 10 MNOK–50 MNOK, Medium 50 MNOK–500 MNOK, Large from 500 MNOK. Methodology

Distribution of the overall index · 2024

01428Index 0–10: 3 companies30Index 10–20: 7 companies710Index 20–30: 9 companies920Index 30–40: 10 companies1030Index 40–50: 26 companies2640Index 50–60: 28 companies2850Index 60–70: 20 companies2060Index 70–80: 10 companies1070Index 80–90: 4 companies480Index 90–100: 0 companies90100Index →

Best in each category · 2024

Operating marginStore Norske Gruvedrift AS83.3%
Return on assetsStore Norske Gruvedrift AS46.7%
Equity ratioFinnmark Sand AS87.2%
Current ratioFinnmark Sand AS6.00
Revenue growthNorsk Massehåndtering AS220.1%

Among ranked companies with at least NOK 10m in revenue. Margins and equity ratios above 100 %, a current ratio above 20 and growth from a base below NOK 10m count as one-off effects and are left out.

Ranking · 2024

Morning Enterprise Index 0–100, version 2: every key figure is compared with companies in the same sector and size tier. Click a column heading to sort.

Rank Company Class Index Operating margin Equity ratio Current ratio Revenue growth Revenue
– Kregnesmo Drift ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 75.4% 4.71 −100.0% 0 MNOK
– Lidalen ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 99.5% 56.90 – –
– Lindland Performance 2 ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 92.1% 4.14 – –
– Luna Industri ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 99.2% 130.63 – –
– MO Grus ASnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – 9.4% 43.4% 1.77 −72.7% 0 MNOK
– MR. Pukk Øst AS 2025 missingnot ranked: Bankrupt or being wound up Small – −23.5% 9.8% 3.17 21.3% 28 MNOK
– MØLLENG MASKIN & Pukk ASnot ranked: Bankrupt or being wound up – – – 100.0% – – 0 MNOK
– Narvik Nikkel AS 2025 missingnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 30.0% – – 0 MNOK
– Naturlig Landro ASnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – 44.9% −3.8% 0.96 −3.6% 0 MNOK
– Nissedal Sandforedling ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 100.0% – – 0 MNOK
– Nlg Holding ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 100.0% – – 0 MNOK
– Norsk Marmor ASnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – 0.0% 98.8% 72.97 −20.4% 0 MNOK
– Novemco ASnot ranked: Balance sheet missing – – – – 0.00 – –
– Nussir ASAnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 91.9% 4.50 – –
– Orkla Grube ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 0.7% 0.89 – –
– OS Naturstein ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – −129.6% 0.16 – –
– Ramsrud ASnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – 65.9% 51.0% 1.17 −17.5% 0 MNOK
– Robusto Holding ASnot ranked: Holding company (ranked in the list «Holding and investment companies») – – – 95.3% 0.00 – 0 MNOK
– Skaugvoll Holding ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 18.4% 0.54 – –
– SKIFERPRODUKTER DESIGN & Produksjon ASnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – −49.7% −239.8% 0.33 69.3% 0 MNOK
– Skogberget ASnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – −74.7% 74.5% 6.79 −1.9% 1 MNOK
– Snåsa Naturstein AS 2025 missingnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – −172.7% −28.7% 1.41 −40.3% 0 MNOK
– Spydeberg Miljødeponi ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – −5.5% 1.00 – –
– Steindalen ASnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – −13,106.3% −15.2% 0.40 −98.2% 0 MNOK
– Strisland Grus ASnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – 1.6% 84.9% 6.61 −40.4% 0 MNOK
– Studedalen Deponi ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 90.0% 8.20 – –
– Sydvaranger Drift ASnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – −47,481.4% 44.2% 0.33 – 0 MNOK
– Sydvaranger Eiendom ASnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – 45.7% 98.0% 28.85 −15.7% 1 MNOK
– Sydvaranger Mining ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 50.5% 0.00 – –
– Sørlie Mining Invest ASnot ranked: Holding company (ranked in the list «Holding and investment companies») – – – 87.4% 8.31 – –
– Telemark Naturstein ASnot ranked: Balance sheet missing – – – – – – –
– Torgeir Løftamo Holding ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – −269.6% 0.01 – 0 MNOK
– TT Masseuttak ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 92.6% 13.59 – 0 MNOK
– Turisme&Naturbruk ASnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – 8.7% 35.8% 1.28 −9.9% 0 MNOK
– Vest-Telemark Teknologipark ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 98.8% 0.12 – –
– Vestfold Pukk og Sand ASnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – −8.4% −19.0% 17.12 −8.5% 1 MNOK
– Vestheim Holding ASnot ranked: Holding company (ranked in the list «Holding and investment companies») – – – 98.6% 46.55 – –
– Vossastein ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – 91.5% 0.67 – –
– Vågsnes Pukk og Anlegg ASnot ranked: Revenue not reported – – – −1,621.6% 0.06 – –
– Øygard ASnot ranked: Not enough data (below minimum revenue) Micro – 99.5% 21.4% – 7.9% 0 MNOK

Bankrupt or being wound up

These companies are left out of the ranking.

About the figures

  • Only limited companies (AS and ASA) are included. Sole proprietorships are normally not required to file annual accounts and are therefore missing.
  • The Brønnøysund Register Centre only checks that accounts are filed, not their content. Suspicious figures are flagged on the company page, not hidden.
  • Figures are company accounts, not group accounts. Holding companies can be marked in admin and then do not count in sector averages.